Home   Cases   Law Review   Law Articles   News   Announcements   Publish   Search  Log In
   
 
Law Review Categories



Accept Credit Cards Online




Five Steps to Improve Your Legal Writing

By: Cherisse Mastry Patton
Law School: University of Houston

Good writing is transparent. It disappears into the background and allows the writer’s meaning to shine through. As attorneys, in our haste to stylize language for the page, we sometimes forget about the most important component of our writing, the reader. Our goal as writers should always be to convey information to the reader in as painless a way as possible. Overwritten, contrived material only serves to hinder this process, as does underwritten, sloppy material. It takes a good deal of effort to deliver a clear, straightforward analysis. To this end, the following tips can be used to help you deliver writing to your readers that is as painless to produce as it is to consume.

(1) Play by Your Own Rules. Whether you are writing a memo, drafting a motion, or preparing a proposal, internal consistency is key. All style and usage rules should be applied consistently throughout your document. Many style rules are flexible. More often than not, it is better to be consistent than to be “right.” For example, if you decide to use a comma before “and” in a series, then go for it—every single time.

The first step is to choose your style guide. Pick one and stick with it. Flipping through multiple books or Googling indiscriminately could cause your consistency to suffer. I recommend either The New York Public Library Writer’s Guide to Style and Usage or The Chicago Manual of Style. Both are excellent resources, and you cannot go wrong choosing either one as your primary guide.

The next step is to create your own personal style rules, and remember them. Print them on a sheet of paper, and keep them near your monitor. Apply them religiously.

(2) Use Your Time Wisely. Generally, legal writing involves the following steps: research, outline, draft, revisions, and final copy. But the process does not always flow as smoothly as we would like, and occasionally even good writers get bogged down in revisions where they lose valuable time. Many writers start out strong with a clear voice and straightforward language only to come to a grinding halt during the revision process because they have become entangled in grammatical nitpicking. Each sentence becomes a struggle, and, before long, the writer is back at the beginning making heavy-handed changes. A related problem involves a different kind of revising—meticulously improving ones writing by embellishing previously simple sentences with adverbs, adjectives, and compound phrases. Engaging in either practice causes needless anguish for the writer and does nothing to help the reader. Yes, we should always edit our work to ensure consistency, avoid grammatical errors, and improve flow, but overdoing it can be worse than doing nothing at all. Short sentences make strong points. They should be preserved. Put a time limit on your editing, and remember that clarity is the key. Give yourself the freedom to be less than perfect. If passive voice conveys your meaning clearly, go with it. Do not waste ten minutes creating an awkward construction just to use the active voice. And if you find yourself logging onto Dictionary.com or picking up a thesaurus in order to give your sentence a little something extra, think twice about whether that adjective or adverb will add clarity to your text. Chances are it will only muddy an already well-turned sentence.

(3) Avoid Blatant Errors. Nothing stops a reader faster than the wrong word tucked neatly into a sentence. While watching the evening news recently, I witnessed a weatherman’s blunder when he presented a chart with the heading: It could [of] been worse. Errors like this one shake a reader’s confidence in the writer, and legal writing is one area where lost credibility can be costly. We all have our own personal Achilles heel when it comes to grammar and usage, be it pronoun problems or words that never fail to confuse. The easiest way to avoid blatant errors is to take note of items that cause you to pause while writing, especially those that make you reach for the nearest style guide. Draft a cheat sheet of content that proves to be continuously problematic, and keep it close at hand.



 






Click the maroon box above for a formatted PDF of the article
a specific exhibit, such as "exhibit a," but it argument you can think of at the reader. leave the weakest want him on this project. use "whom." writers start out strong with a clear voice and straightforward reference in case names, except for electric, electrical, clerks, partners and senior associates. these individuals are weatherman's blunder when he presented a chart with the extra, think twice about whether that adjective or adverb will insurance not homeowners' insurance. practicing law can be stimulating and deeply satisfying, but, most (3) that/who (referring to persons): use "that" section of porter & hedges, l.l.p., formerly the law clerk to are flexible. more often than not, it is better to be consistent to your readers that is as painless to produce as it is to consume. down in revisions where they lose valuable time. many to avoid overkill in your writing. do not throw every possible. giving your reader a chance to view your legal and memos will end up on the desks of judges and law (1) its/it's: "its" is a possessive pronoun. "it's" before "and" in a series, then go for it--every single time. do not place periods at the end of items(8) sense. electricity, and electronic. these are not burnout. use "who" to refer to an individual: the sentence. he were scott turow (untrue; he is not and component of our writing, the reader. our goal as writers should awkward construction just to use the active voice. and if "him" for "whom" to determine which to remember that clarity is the key. give yourself the freedom is a contraction; substitute "it is" and sheet of content that proves to be continuously problematic, period. of items in a series in bulleted or numbered the words "email" and "website" should(7) kind of revising--meticulously improving ones writing of commas to create emphasis or avoid document and the lawyer." to refer to a group of people: lawyers that of law. avoid the urge to pad your legal reasoning with clearly, go with it. do not waste ten minutes creating an instead, use real-world examples and comparisons whenever heading: it could [of] been worse. errors like this one shake a nonessential the phrase "who makes frequent trips to court" is an essential appear as one word, no hyphen, lower case. stick with it. flipping through multiple books or googling 18 journal of consumer & commercial lawjournal of consumer & commercial law recommend either the new york public librarywriter's guide should be preserved. put a time limit on your editing, and online resources. for example, see exhibits use: [___] do you want on this project? you than to be "right." for example, if you decide to use a comma sample cheat sheet her attendance in court. finally, try not to write your best points to death by use bluebook t.6 abbreviations for all words(1) copy. but the process does not always flow as smoothly as we importance of good writing. the meaning of make you reach for the nearest style guide. draft a cheat good writing is transparent. clause. mistakenly setting off this clause with commas would arguments, when i see nonsense thrown in, it makes me to shine through. as attorneys, in our haste to stylize language matter of personal style as there is flexibility in the application confusion; they can also be used instead of the next step is to create your own personal style rules, and (2) useyourtimewisely. generally, legal writing involves the long, the writer is back at the beginning making heavy- like staccato jazz, interesting but hard to follow. a dearth of area where lost credibility can be costly. we all have our own is lower case when used otherwise, such as a and b, but see smith v. jones.... "the exhibits attached to this motion." to believe that the writer does not have faith in his or her improve the quality of your writing. commas can be equally unsettling to the reader. the trick reference to an internal exhibit, but it is point in the reader's mind. "see" is not italicized when it precedes a(4) (5) play to the crowd. remember who your audience is, and purpose; they prevent the reader from becoming confused. (1) play by your own rules. whether you are writing a (6) m-dash: m-dashes can be used instead regurgitating multiple variations of the applicable rule you find yourself logging onto dictionary.com or picking up single m-dash can be used instead of a colon that state conditions that are untrue or place apostrophe as follows: homeowner's(3) with. although it is normal for lawyers to make alternative sentence. consider the following sentence: every lawyer who * cherisse mastry patton has served as an editor/legal editor for lists. the final item should end with a deleted from while watching the evening news recently, i witnessed a than the wrong word tucked neatly into a sentence. remember them. print them on a sheet of paper, and keep points. joshua wolfshohl, an associate in the bankruptcy always be to convey information to the reader in as painless a way (3) avoid blatant errors. nothing stops a reader faster journal of consumer & commercial law 19 a lawyer is a person who understands the primary points; this tends to erode the credibility of both the process because they have become entangled in grammatical improve flow, but overdoing it can be worse than doing place semicolons (not commas) at the end(9) you will be able to take some of the pain out of the process and and keep it close at hand. language from only marginally related cases and statutes. deleted from a sentence without altering the meaning of the rife with overkill: "reading a twenty-page document that without altering or come before: a precedes b. "proceed" nothing at all. short sentences make strong points. they the first step is to choose your style guide. pick one and publications program, 1994. consistency is key. all style and usage rules should be applied to be less than perfect. if passive voice conveys your meaning adjectives, and compound phrases. engaging in either five italicizedforallexternalreferences,including by embellishing previously simple sentences with adverbs, with essential and nonessential clauses. commas are used handed changes. a related problem involves a different complete sentence. improve your (4) use commas wisely. the rules of punctuation serve one makes frequent trips to court should dress conservatively. write to that level. be conscious of the fact that motions means to move forward: please proceed with consistently throughout your document. many style rules nothing to help the reader. yes, we should always edit our parentheses to provide extra information. a like a slow climb up a steep mountain. by following these tips, nitpicking. each sentence becomes a struggle, and, before the honorable wesley w. steen, united states bankruptcy incorrectly alter the meaning of the sentence to imply that would like, and occasionally even good writers get bogged over seven years. she currently works as an attorney/editor. is the comma. documents riddled with commas can read a sentence that cause you to pause while writing, especially those that example, (1st cir. 1991). in bulleted or numbered lists unless the practice causes needless anguish for the writer and does judge, has first-hand experience weeding through documents one as your primary guide. use a comma before and/or in a series.(6) to set off nonessential clauses. a nonessential clause can be it disappears into the background and allows the writer's meaning personal achilles heel when it comes to grammar and usage, the punctuation mark that tends to cause the most confusion steps unlikely to occur, use "were": tom acts as if clause can be is to find a workable medium. doing so is to some extent a add clarity to your text. chances are it will only muddy an abbreviated. every lawyer should dress conservatively regardless of his or the deposition. (4) precede/proceed: "precede" means to go or to show hesitation or broken speech. good deal of effort to deliver a clear, straightforward analysis. to days, it is hard work. at times, the task of legal writing can feel already well-turned sentence. (5) who/whom: substitute "he" for "who" and this end, the following tips can be used to help you deliver writing legal writing be it pronoun problems or words that never fail to confuse. following steps: research, outline, draft, revisions, and final perceptive, and their time is valuable. it is therefore essential use of commas is imperative (and most often problematic)-- excellent resources, and you cannot go wrong choosing either language only to come to a grinding halt during the revision by cherisse mastry patton* a reader's confidence in the writer, and legal writing is one indiscriminately could cause your consistency to suffer. i them near your monitor. apply them religiously. of commas. however, there is one area where the correct memo, drafting a motion, or preparing a proposal, internal theories through a practical lens will help to crystallize your the new york public library writer's guide to style and do not use superscript in case citations. for(5) should have been six pages is the most difficult thing to deal to style and usage or the chicago manual of style. both are (2) were/was (subjunctive mood): in sentences consider whether the sentence still makes for the page, we sometimes forget about the most important language in at least one of the items forms a you if he or she is not forced to disagree with you on small a thesaurus in order to give your sentence a little something this process, as does underwritten, sloppy material. it takes a "exhibit(s)" is capitalized when referring to(2) journal of consumer & commercial law 17 never will be). work to ensure consistency, avoid grammatical errors, and sample style rules usage, new york, n.y.: the new york public library arguments out. your reader will have more confidence in focus solely on their work are susceptible to as possible. overwritten, contrived material only serves to hinder the easiest way to avoid blatant errors is to take note of items


All Content © 2007-2010 The Judicial View, L.L.C. All Right Reserved.
About The Judicial View ™  | Privacy Policy   |  Terms of Use   |  Contact Us  |  Advertise   |  Site Map