Home   Federal Cases   State Cases   Law Review   Law Articles   News   Announcements   Publish   Search  Log In
   
 
Announcement Directory
Adams & Reese
Adams and Reese
Amicus
Arnold & Porter
Baker & Hostetler
Bingham
Bingham McCutchen
Bingham McCutchen, LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon
Cantey Hanger
Cantey Hanger Law Firm
Cantey Hanger, LLP
Connell Foley
Dechert
Decker Jones
Decker, Jones, McMackin, McClane, Hall & Bates
Dinsmore & Shohl
Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP
Dismuke, Waters & Sweet
Farrell Fritz
Farrell Fritz, P.C.
Fried Frank
Genovese Joblove & Battista
Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis
Hart, King & Coldren
Harvey Williams LLP
Holland & Knight
Holland & Knight LLP
Holland & Knight, LLP
Hovey Williams
Hovey Williams LLP
Howrey
Lathrop & Gage
Legal Aid
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun
Miller Canfield
Nixon Peabody
Ober|Kaler
Patton Boggs
Phillips Lyte
Saul Ewing
Scarola Ellis
Seyfarth Shaw
Sills Cummis & Gross
Sutherland
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan, LLP
Troutman Sanders
Tully Rinckey
W
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston
Winstead
Winstead PC



Accept Credit Cards Online




Holland & Knight Attorney Successful in Upholding Raba-Kistner's Patent in Federal Appeals Court

Law Firm: Holland & Knight, LLP

Washington, D.C. – July 23, 2010 – Holland & Knight is pleased to announce that John P. Moran, an attorney in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office was successful in upholding his client, Raba-Kistner’s win over Atser Research Technologies Inc. in Federal Appeals Court.

Speaking on behalf of his client, Raba-Kistner Consultants Inc., Moran said, “We are very pleased with the appeals court’s ruling, especially in view of the litigation misconduct that gave rise to the finding that the case is exceptional and the award of attorney’s fees to Raba-Kistner.”

For almost four years, Raba-Kistner fought accusations that its software infringed an Atser patent. Atser originally accused Raba-Kistner’s software used on a Texas state highway project. Atser expanded the suit to include Raba-Kistner’s commercial software and demanded millions of dollars in damages.

From the beginning of the case, Raba-Kistner and Moran fought to have Atser provide documents from its early work leading to the patent. Despite a court order to provide the documents, Atser did not do so. Raba-Kistner was able to overcome the Atser’s roadblock when Holland & Knight located copies of documents in the archives of the Utah Department of Transportation.

Using the documents it found in Utah, Raba-Kistner asked U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas to invalidate Atser’s patent. Last year, the District Court handed Raba-Kistner a complete victory. Not only did it find the Atser patent invalid, but it also found that that Atser’s failure to provide documents was litigation misconduct that rendered the case exceptional. The District Court also awarded Raba-Kistner attorney’s fees, amounting to about $1.2 million, due to Atser’s litigation misconduct.

Atser appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Within twenty-four hours of hearing the appeal, the Court affirmed Raba-Kistner’s victory.


About Holland & Knight LLP:

Holland & Knight is a global law firm with more than 1,000 lawyers in 17 U.S. offices as well as Abu Dhabi, Beijing and Mexico City. The firm is among the nation’s largest law firms, providing representation in litigation, business, real estate and governmental law. Interdisciplinary practice groups and industry-based teams provide clients with access to attorneys throughout the firm, regardless of location. www.hklaw.com









All Content © 2007-2010 The Judicial View, L.L.C. All Right Reserved.
About The Judicial View ™  | Privacy Policy   |  Terms of Use   |  Contact Us  |  Advertise   |  Site Map